Discount Offer
Home / Amazon Web Services / AWS Certified Associate / MLA-C01 - AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate

Amazon Web Services MLA-C01 Exam Dumps

Total Questions Answers: 85
Last Updated: 28-Mar-2025
Available with 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Free Updates Plans
PDF: $15 $60

Online Test: $20 $80

PDF + Online Test: $25 $99



Pass MLA-C01 exam with Dumps4free or we will provide you with three additional months of access for FREE.


Check Our Recently Added MLA-C01 Practice Exam Questions


Question # 1



A company uses Amazon SageMaker for its ML workloads. The company's ML engineer receives a 50 MB Apache Parquet data file to build a fraud detection model. The file includes several correlated columns that are not required.
What should the ML engineer do to drop the unnecessary columns in the file with the LEAST effort?
A. Download the file to a local workstation. Perform one-hot encoding by using a custom Python script.
B. Create an Apache Spark job that uses a custom processing script on Amazon EMR.
C. Create a SageMaker processing job by calling the SageMaker Python SDK.
D. Create a data flow in SageMaker Data Wrangler. Configure a transform step.



D.
  Create a data flow in SageMaker Data Wrangler. Configure a transform step.



Explanation:

SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a no-code/low-code interface for preparing and transforming data, including dropping unnecessary columns. By creating a data flow and configuring a transform step, the ML engineer can easily remove correlated or unneeded columns from the Parquet file with minimal effort. This approach avoids the need for custom coding or managing additional infrastructure.




Question # 2



Case study

An ML engineer is developing a fraud detection model on AWS. The training dataset includes transaction logs, customer profiles, and tables from an on-premises MySQL database. The transaction logs and customer profiles are stored in Amazon S3.
The dataset has a class imbalance that affects the learning of the model's algorithm. Additionally, many of the features have interdependencies. The algorithm is not capturing all the desired underlying patterns in the data.
Before the ML engineer trains the model, the ML engineer must resolve the issue of the imbalanced data.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational effort?
A. Use Amazon Athena to identify patterns that contribute to the imbalance. Adjust the dataset accordingly.
B. Use Amazon SageMaker Studio Classic built-in algorithms to process the imbalanced dataset.
C. Use AWS Glue DataBrew built-in features to oversample the minority class.
D. Use the Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler balance data operation to oversample the minority class.



D.
  Use the Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler balance data operation to oversample the minority class.





Question # 3



A company has deployed an ML model that detects fraudulent credit card transactions in real time in a banking application. The model uses Amazon SageMaker Asynchronous Inference. Consumers are reporting delays in receiving the inference results.
An ML engineer needs to implement a solution to improve the inference performance. The solution also must provide a notification when a deviation in model quality occurs.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
A. Use SageMaker real-time inference for inference. Use SageMaker Model Monitor for notifications about model quality.
B. Use SageMaker batch transform for inference. Use SageMaker Model Monitor for notifications about model quality.
C. Use SageMaker Serverless Inference for inference. Use SageMaker Inference Recommender for notifications about model quality.
D. Keep using SageMaker Asynchronous Inference for inference. Use SageMaker Inference Recommender for notifications about model quality.



A.
  Use SageMaker real-time inference for inference. Use SageMaker Model Monitor for notifications about model quality.



Explanation:

SageMaker real-time inference is designed for low-latency, real-time use cases, such as detecting fraudulent transactions in banking applications. It eliminates the delays associated with SageMaker Asynchronous Inference, improving inference performance.
SageMaker Model Monitor provides tools to monitor deployed models for deviations in data quality, model performance, and other metrics. It can be configured to send notifications when a deviation in model quality is detected, ensuring the system remains reliable.




Question # 4



A company has historical data that shows whether customers needed long-term support from company staff. The company needs to develop an ML model to predict whether new customers will require long-term support.
Which modeling approach should the company use to meet this requirement?
A. Anomaly detection
B. Linear regression
C. Logistic regression
D. Semantic segmentation



C.
  Logistic regression



Explanation:

Logistic regression is a suitable modeling approach for this requirement because it is designed for binary classification problems, such as predicting whether a customer will require long-term support ("yes" or "no"). It calculates the probability of a particular class and is widely used for tasks like this where the outcome is categorical.




Question # 5



A company is creating an application that will recommend products for customers to purchase. The application will make API calls to Amazon Q Business. The company must ensure that responses from Amazon Q Business do not include the name of the company's main competitor.
Which solution will meet this requirement?
A. Configure the competitor's name as a blocked phrase in Amazon Q Business.
B. Configure an Amazon Q Business retriever to exclude the competitor’s name.
C. Configure an Amazon Kendra retriever for Amazon Q Business to build indexes that exclude the competitor's name.
D. Configure document attribute boosting in Amazon Q Business to deprioritize the competitor's name.



A.
  Configure the competitor's name as a blocked phrase in Amazon Q Business.



Explanation:

Amazon Q Business allows configuring blocked phrases to exclude specific terms or phrases from the responses. By adding the competitor's name as a blocked phrase, the company can ensure that it will not appear in the API responses, meeting the requirement efficiently with minimal configuration.




Question # 6



An ML engineer is training a simple neural network model. The ML engineer tracks the performance of the model over time on a validation dataset. The model's performance improves substantially at first and then degrades after a specific number of epochs.
Which solutions will mitigate this problem? (Choose two.)
A. Enable early stopping on the model.
B. Increase dropout in the layers.
C. Increase the number of layers.
D. Increase the number of neurons.
E. Investigate and reduce the sources of model bias.



A.
  Enable early stopping on the model.


B.
  Increase dropout in the layers.



Explanation:

Early stopping halts training once the performance on the validation dataset stops improving. This prevents the model from overfitting, which is likely the cause of performance degradation after a certain number of epochs.
Dropout is a regularization technique that randomly deactivates neurons during training, reducing overfitting by forcing the model to generalize better. Increasing dropout can help mitigate the problem of performance degradation due to overfitting.




Question # 7



An ML engineer needs to use AWS CloudFormation to create an ML model that an Amazon SageMaker endpoint will host.
Which resource should the ML engineer declare in the CloudFormation template to meet this requirement?
A. AWS::SageMaker::Model
B. AWS::SageMaker::Endpoint
C. AWS::SageMaker::NotebookInstance
D. AWS::SageMaker::Pipeline



A.
  AWS::SageMaker::Model



Explanation:

The AWS::SageMaker::Model resource in AWS CloudFormation is used to create an ML model in Amazon SageMaker. This model can then be hosted on an endpoint by using the AWS::SageMaker::Endpoint resource. The model resource defines the container or algorithm to use for hosting and the S3 location of the model artifacts.




Question # 8



An ML engineer needs to use an ML model to predict the price of apartments in a specific location.

Which metric should the ML engineer use to evaluate the model's performance?
A. Accuracy
B. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)
C. F1 score
D. Mean absolute error (MAE)



D.
  Mean absolute error (MAE)



Explanation:

When predicting continuous variables, such as apartment prices, it's essential to evaluate the model's performance using appropriate regression metrics. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is a widely used metric for this purpose.

Understanding Mean Absolute Error (MAE):
MAE measures the average magnitude of errors in a set of predictions, without considering their direction. It calculates the average absolute difference between predicted values and actual values, providing a straightforward interpretation of prediction accuracy.
Advantages of MAE:
Interpretability:MAE is expressed in the same units as the target variable, making it easy to understand.
Robustness to Outliers:Unlike metrics that square the errors (e.g., Mean Squared Error), MAE does not disproportionately penalize larger errors, making it more robust to outliers.
Comparison with Other Metrics:
Accuracy, AUC, F1 Score:These metrics are designed for classification tasks, where the goal is to predict discrete labels. They are not suitable for regression problems involving continuous target variables.
Mean Squared Error (MSE):While MSE also measures prediction errors, it squares the differences, giving more weight to larger errors. This can be useful in certain contexts but may be sensitive to outliers.

Conclusion:
For evaluating the performance of a model predicting apartment prices—a continuous variable—MAE is an appropriate and effective metric. It provides a clear indication of the average prediction error in the same units as the target variable, facilitating straightforward interpretation and comparison.




Get 85 AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate questions Access in less then $0.12 per day.

Amazon Web Services Bundle 1:


1 Month PDF Access For All Amazon Web Services Exams with Updates
$200

$800

Buy Bundle 1

Amazon Web Services Bundle 2:


3 Months PDF Access For All Amazon Web Services Exams with Updates
$300

$1200

Buy Bundle 2

Amazon Web Services Bundle 3:


6 Months PDF Access For All Amazon Web Services Exams with Updates
$450

$1800

Buy Bundle 3

Amazon Web Services Bundle 4:


12 Months PDF Access For All Amazon Web Services Exams with Updates
$600

$2400

Buy Bundle 4
Disclaimer: Fair Usage Policy - Daily 5 Downloads

AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate Test Dumps


Exam Code: MLA-C01
Exam Name: AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate

  • 90 Days Free Updates
  • Amazon Web Services Experts Verified Answers
  • Printable PDF File Format
  • MLA-C01 Exam Passing Assurance

Get 100% Real MLA-C01 Exam Dumps With Verified Answers As Seen in the Real Exam. AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate Exam Questions are Updated Frequently and Reviewed by Industry TOP Experts for Passing AWS Certified Associate Exam Quickly and Hassle Free.

Amazon Web Services MLA-C01 Test Dumps


Struggling with AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate preparation? Get the edge you need! Our carefully created MLA-C01 test dumps give you the confidence to pass the exam. We offer:

1. Up-to-date AWS Certified Associate practice questions: Stay current with the latest exam content.
2. PDF and test engine formats: Choose the study tools that work best for you.
3. Realistic Amazon Web Services MLA-C01 practice exam: Simulate the real exam experience and boost your readiness.

Pass your AWS Certified Associate exam with ease. Try our study materials today!


Prepare your AWS Certified Associate exam with confidence!

We provide top-quality MLA-C01 exam dumps materials that are:

1. Accurate and up-to-date: Reflect the latest Amazon Web Services exam changes and ensure you are studying the right content.
2. Comprehensive Cover all exam topics so you do not need to rely on multiple sources.
3. Convenient formats: Choose between PDF files and online AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate practice questions for easy studying on any device.

Do not waste time on unreliable MLA-C01 practice test. Choose our proven AWS Certified Associate study materials and pass with flying colors. Try Dumps4free AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate 2024 material today!

  • Assurance

    AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate practice exam has been updated to reflect the most recent questions from the Amazon Web Services MLA-C01 Exam.

  • Demo

    Try before you buy! Get a free demo of our AWS Certified Associate exam dumps and see the quality for yourself. Need help? Chat with our support team.

  • Validity

    Our Amazon Web Services MLA-C01 PDF contains expert-verified questions and answers, ensuring you're studying the most accurate and relevant material.

  • Success

    Achieve MLA-C01 success! Our AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer-Associate exam questions give you the preparation edge.

If you have any question then contact our customer support at live chat or email us at support@dumps4free.com.