Adobe AD0-E906 Test Dumps

B.   Upload the document with a proofing approval workflow attached

Answer DescriptionExplanation:

For a workflow where a task assignee must upload a document, have it reviewed and marked up with annotations, and then have it approved by the director and customer, the best option is toupload the document with a proofing approval workflow attached. Proofing workflows allow for:

Annotations: Reviewers can mark up the document with comments and annotations.

Approvals: Once the document is reviewed, it can go through the necessary approval stages, including the director and customer.

Option A (using approvals under document details) does not allow for the same level of markup and annotation as a proofing workflow. Option C (uploading to a subtask) is not an ideal way to manage the review and approval process with annotations.

Refer toWorkfront’s proofing documentationfor more information on setting up proofing workflows with annotations and approvals.

A.   Stage 1 activate on proof creation, routing to the creative director, select do not allow this stage to be deleted.


D.   Stage 2 activate when all decisions are made on parent stage and select only one decision required.

Answer DescriptionExplanation:

In this scenario, the proofing workflow needs two stages:

Stage 1: This stage routes the proof to thecreative directorupon proof creation. By selecting "do not allow this stage to be deleted," the workflow ensures that the creative director must always review the proof before it is sent to stakeholders. This ensures consistency in the review process and makes sure the creative director is always involved.

Stage 2: This stage activates whenall decisions are madeon the parent stage (i.e., the creative director’s approval). Additionally, since the creative agency only requiresone decision from each company, the "only one decision required" setting is appropriate to speed up the process while ensuring the necessary approvals are gathered.

Option B is incorrect because setting the stage as private may hinder collaboration, and Option C suggests waiting until all decisions are approved, which is not necessary in this scenario.

Refer toWorkfront documentation on proofing workflowsfor details on setting up multi-stage approval processes.

B.   Select the document in Workfront. click Send to, choose the Experience Manager integration, and metadata will synch automatically

Answer DescriptionExplanation:

When metadata mappings between Adobe Workfront and AEM are configured, the process of sending a document along with its metadata from Workfront to Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets is streamlined. The user selects the document in Workfront, clicks "Send to," and chooses the Experience Manager integration.

The metadata fields that have been mapped are automatically synchronized along with the document. There is no need for manual selection of metadata at this stage, as the integration ensures that all configured mappings are applied.

This functionality is part of the enhanced connector, which simplifies the workflow between Workfront and AEM Assets by automating the synchronization of mapped metadata fields during the document transfer.

For more details, refer to Adobe's documentation onWorkfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector, which outlines how automatic metadata synchronization works during document transfers.

B.   Web Proofing viewer

Answer DescriptionExplanation:

In this scenario, the reviewer needs to leave comments on an interactive web content URL and tag the designer. TheWeb Proofing vieweris the appropriate tool for reviewing interactive web content in Adobe Workfront. The Web Proofing viewer allows users to:

Review and commenton web-based content directly in the browser.

Tag usersin comments and updates.

Approve or rejectthe content with the necessary feedback.

Option A (Desktop Proofing viewer) is typically used for offline or downloadable content, and Option C (Legacy Proofing viewer) refers to an outdated tool that lacks modern proofing functionalities.

Refer toWorkfront’s proofing documentationfor more information on using the Web Proofing viewer for interactive content.

C.   The namespace 'myProject is not registered.

Answer DescriptionExplanation:

The issue of the custom field not displaying correctly on a component is likely because thenamespace 'myProject'is not registered in AEM. AEM requires that custom namespaces be registered before they can be used for storing metadata properties. Without registering the myProject namespace, the system cannot properly recognize the custom property, leading to issues displaying the value.

Namespace registration: Custom namespaces like myProject need to be defined in AEM before they can be used to store properties.

Option A is incorrect because the text field should accept special characters, and Option B is incorrect unless there is already a conflicting property name, which is not indicated in this scenario.

Refer toAEM documentation on namespace registrationfor steps on how to register a custom namespace in AEM.