Topic 2: Scenario 2 "Reviews"
What is the main reason why reviews are especially beneficial in the above-mentioned
scenario? 2 credits
A.
They ensure a common understanding of the product.
B.
They find defects early.
C.
They enhance project communication.
D.
They can be performed without exercising the code
They can be performed without exercising the code
The introduction of reviews and inspections has often failed as a process improvement
action. Identify the THREE most important measures that should be taken to reduce the
risk that this test process improvement will fail. 2 Credits (for 2 out of 3 correct 1 credit)
A.
Process ownership and experienced moderators who drive the inspection process.
B.
Management support
C.
Training of those involved
D.
The availability of stands and processes
E.
Usage of a more traditional software development lifecycle
F.
Alignment with software process improvement
G.
Using a reference model, e.g. TMMi
Process ownership and experienced moderators who drive the inspection process.
Management support
Training of those involved
As part of the improvement program, the organization is also looking at tool support. Which
type of tool could be used to ensure higher quality of the code to be reviewed? 1 credit
A.
Review tool
B.
Test execution tool
C.
Static analysis tool
D.
Test design tool
Static analysis tool
Which of the following would you least expect to form part of the analysis of initial tool
costs? 1 credit
A.
Integration with other tools
B.
Learning time required to use the new tool
C.
Tool portability
D.
Evaluation of suitable tools
Tool portability
Select THREE issues from the options provided that should at least be raised. 1 credit
A.
Has there been sufficient comparison of tools?
B.
What are the problems we are trying to address?
C.
Do we have a set of tool requirements to validate the tool against?
D.
How will the implementation be organized?
E.
Which project will be selected to perform the tool pilot?
F.
Is customized training available?
G.
How will the change process be managed?
Has there been sufficient comparison of tools?
What are the problems we are trying to address?
Do we have a set of tool requirements to validate the tool against?
Page 3 out of 66 Pages |
Previous |