Discount Offer
Go Back on CIFC Exam
Available in 1, 3, 6 and 12 Months Free Updates Plans
PDF: $15 $60

Test Engine: $20 $80

PDF + Engine: $25 $99



Pass exam with Dumps4free or we will provide you with three additional months of access for FREE.

CIFC Practice Test

Whether you're a beginner or brushing up on skills, our CIFC practice exam is your key to success. Our comprehensive question bank covers all key topics, ensuring you’re fully prepared.


Page 7 out of 45 Pages

What areas are addressed in the Client Relationship Model (CRM) regulation?


A. relationship disclosure, client communications, and client reporting


B. fraud prevention, relationship disclosure, and proper conduct


C. client communications, regulatory reporting, and fraud prevention


D. ethics, proper conduct, and client reporting





A.
  relationship disclosure, client communications, and client reporting

Leira has a marginal tax rate of 45% and may deduct $5,000 in registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) contributions on her income tax return. If she decides to use her available deduction and assuming this does not reduce her taxable income to a lower tax bracket, by how much will it reduce her tax payable?


A. $5,000


B. $4,500


C. $2,250


D. $0





C.
  $2,250

Explanation: A registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) is a type of tax-deferred account that allows individuals to save for retirement. Contributions to an RRSP are deductible from taxable income, which means that they reduce the amount of income tax payable for the year. The amount of tax savings from an RRSP contribution depends on the individual’s marginal tax rate, which is the tax rate applied to the next dollar earned. Leira has a marginal tax rate of 45% and may deduct $5,000 in RRSP contributions on her income tax return. If she decides to use her available deduction and assuming this does not reduce her taxable income to a lower tax bracket, by how much will it reduce her tax payable? To answer this question, we can use the following formula: $$(Tax savings = RRSP contribution \times Marginal tax rate)

Sheldon is a 25 year old graphic designer. He has just started working and saves regularly. Apart from his regular salary he also earns extra money from freelancing after office hours and during weekends. His earnings from his freelance work are sufficient for meeting his living expenses. He saves the entire amount of his salary. He has heard about lifecycle funds but has come to you for additional information. Which of the following statement about lifecycle funds is TRUE?


A. As Sheldon gets older, the life cycle asset allocation changes from more risky to less risky.


B. All lifecycle funds start with equal allocations to cash, fixed income and equities before being re-balanced.


C. The asset allocation of a lifecycle fund is set based on the age demographic of its unitholders and remains the same for the time frame of the lifecycle fund.


D. Investor income is the only basis for changing the asset allocation of a lifecycle mutual fund.





A.
  As Sheldon gets older, the life cycle asset allocation changes from more risky to less risky.

Explanation: A lifecycle fund is a type of asset-allocation fund that automatically adjusts its portfolio composition according to the investor’s age and risk tolerance. As the investor gets closer to their retirement date or target date, the fund shifts from more risky assets, such as stocks, to less risky assets, such as bonds and cash. This is done to reduce the volatility and preserve the capital of the fund as the investor approaches their withdrawal phase. Therefore, statement A is true about lifecycle funds. Statement B is false because different lifecycle funds may have different initial allocations depending on their target dates and risk profiles. Statement C is false because the asset allocation of a lifecycle fund changes over time according to a predetermined glide path that gradually reduces risk. Statement D is false because investor income is not the only basis for changing the asset allocation of a lifecycle fund; other factors, such as age, risk tolerance, investment objectives, and time horizon, are also considered.

Darryl has a diversified investment portfolio of mutual funds in a non-registered account with Invest well Mutual Funds, a mutual fund dealer. Darryl’s diversified portfolio is composed of 3 mutual funds. Each mutual fund is currently worth about $100,000. The ABC Canadian Equity Fund has a total return of 6%, the DEF Bond Fund has a total return of 8% and GHI Global Equity Fund has a total return of 10%. Darryl wants to make an in kind contribution to his registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) account. He has unused RRSP contribution room of $60,000.
From a tax-efficient viewpoint, which funds contribute in-kind to his RRSP account?


A. Move the DEF Bond Fund to the RRSP.


B. Move the GHI Global Equity Fund to the RRSP


C. Move $20,000 from each of the three funds to the RRSP.


D. Move the ABC Canadian Equity Fund to the RRSP.





A.
  Move the DEF Bond Fund to the RRSP.

Explanation: Moving the DEF Bond Fund to the RRSP would be more tax-efficient than moving any of the other funds. This is because bond funds generate interest income, which is fully taxable at the investor’s marginal tax rate in a non-registered account. By moving the bond fund to an RRSP, Darryl can defer paying taxes on the interest income until he withdraws it from the RRSP. Moving the GHI Global Equity Fund to the RRSP (B) would not be tax-efficient, as global equity funds generate foreign income and dividends, which are subject to foreign withholding taxes in an RRSP. Moving $20,000 from each of the three funds to the RRSP © would not be tax-efficient, as it would trigger capital gains taxes on all three funds in proportion to their returns. Moving the ABC Canadian Equity Fund to the RRSP (D) would not be tax-efficient, as Canadian equity funds generate Canadian dividends, which are eligible for a dividend tax credit in a non-registered account. By moving the Canadian equity fund to an RRSP, Darryl would lose this tax advantage and pay taxes on the dividends at his marginal tax rate when he withdraws them from the RRSP.

During the calendar year, Firmansyah received a $1,800 eligible dividend from a large Canadian bank and a foreign, dividend from his The USD/CAD exchange rates is 1.3605. Firmansyah’s federal marginal tax bracket is 29%. The enhanced dividend gross-up rate is 38% and the federal dividend tax credit rate for eligible dividends is 15%. What federal tax liability will be due from the investment income?


A. $522.00


B. $348.00


C. $695.76


D. $870.00





C.
  $695.76

Explanation: To calculate Firmansyah’s federal tax liability from the investment income, we need to follow these steps:

Step 1: Convert the foreign dividend from USD to CAD using the exchange rate given in the question. The exchange rate is 1.3605 CAD per USD, which means that 1 USD is equivalent to 1.3605 CAD. Therefore, Firmansyah’s foreign dividend in CAD is:

500×1.3605=680.25

Step 2: Calculate Firmansyah’s grossed-up dividend income from both sources. A grossed-up dividend income is the actual dividend received plus a percentage of the dividend that reflects the corporate tax paid by the issuer. The percentage varies depending on whether the dividend is eligible or non-eligible. According to [this site], an eligible dividend is a dividend paid by a Canadian corporation that meets certain criteria, such as being listed on a designated stock exchange or being a subsidiary of such a corporation. A non-eligible dividend is a dividend that does not meet these criteria, such as a dividend paid by a foreign corporation or a small Canadian business corporation. The gross-up rate for eligible dividends in 2020 was 38%, while the gross-up rate for non-eligible dividends in 2020 was 15%. Therefore, Firmansyah’s grossed-up dividend income from both sources is:

(1800+680.25)×(1+0.38)=3426.35

Step 3: Apply Firmansyah’s federal marginal tax rate to his grossed-up dividend income to get his federal tax before credits. A marginal tax rate is the percentage of tax applied to an additional dollar of income. According to [this site], Firmansyah’s federal marginal tax rate for 2020 was 29%, as his taxable income was between $150,473 and $214,368. Therefore, Firmansyah’s federal tax before credits is:

0.29×3426.35=993.64

Step 4: Subtract Firmansyah’s federal dividend tax credit from his federal tax before credits to get his net federal tax liability from the investment income. A dividend tax credit is a percentage of the grossed-up dividend income that reflects the corporate tax paid by the issuer and avoids double taxation. The percentage varies depending on whether the dividend is eligible or non-eligible. According to [this site], the federal dividend tax credit rate for eligible dividends in 2020 was 15%, while the federal dividend tax credit rate for non-eligible dividends in 2020 was 9.03%. Therefore, Firmansyah’s federal dividend tax credit from both sources is:

(1800+680.25)×0.38×0.15=297.88

Step 5: Subtract Firmansyah’s federal dividend tax credit from his federal tax before credits to get his net federal tax liability from the investment income. This is the amount of federal income tax that Firmansyah has to pay or has overpaid from the investment income. Therefore, Firmansyah’s net federal tax liability from the investment income is:

993.64297.88=695.76


Page 7 out of 45 Pages
Previous