To invisibly maintain access to a machine, an attacker utilizes a toolkit that sits undetected
In the core components of the operating system. What is this type of rootkit an example of?
A.
Mypervisor rootkit
B.
Kernel toolkit
C.
Hardware rootkit
D.
Firmware rootkit
Kernel toolkit
Explanation: Kernel-mode rootkits run with the best operating system privileges (Ring 0)
by adding code or replacement parts of the core operating system, as well as each the
kernel and associated device drivers. Most operative systems support kernel-mode device
drivers, that execute with a similar privileges because the software itself. As such, several
kernel-mode rootkits square measure developed as device drivers or loadable modules,
like loadable kernel modules in Linux or device drivers in Microsoft Windows. This category
of rootkit has unrestricted security access, however is tougher to jot down. The quality
makes bugs common, and any bugs in code operative at the kernel level could seriously
impact system stability, resulting in discovery of the rootkit. one amongst the primary wide
familiar kernel rootkits was developed for Windows NT four.0 and discharged in Phrack
magazine in 1999 by Greg Hoglund. Kernel rootkits is particularly tough to observe and
take away as a result of they operate at a similar security level because the software itself,
and square measure therefore able to intercept or subvert the foremost sure software
operations. Any package, like antivirus package, running on the compromised system is
equally vulnerable. during this scenario, no a part of the system is sure.
While using your bank’s online servicing you notice the following string in the URL bar:
“http: // www. MyPersonalBank. com/
account?id=368940911028389&Damount=10980&Camount=21”
You observe that if you modify the Damount & Camount values and submit the request,
that data on the web page reflects the changes.
Which type of vulnerability is present on this site?
A.
Cookie Tampering
B.
SQL Injection
C.
Web Parameter Tampering
D.
XSS Reflection
Web Parameter Tampering
which of the following information security controls creates an appealing isolated
environment for hackers to prevent them from compromising critical targets while
simultaneously gathering information about the hacker?
A.
intrusion detection system
B.
Honeypot
C.
Botnet
D.
Firewall
Honeypot
Explanation: A honeypot may be a trap that an IT pro lays for a malicious hacker, hoping
that they will interact with it during a way that gives useful intelligence. It’s one among the
oldest security measures in IT, but beware: luring hackers onto your network, even on an
isolated system, are often a dangerous game.honeypot may be a good starting place: “A
honeypot may be a computer or computing system intended to mimic likely targets of
cyberattacks.” Often a honeypot are going to be deliberately configured with known
vulnerabilities in situation to form a more tempting or obvious target for attackers. A
honeypot won’t contain production data or participate in legitimate traffic on your network
— that’s how you’ll tell anything happening within it’s a results of an attack. If someone’s
stopping by, they’re up to no good.That definition covers a various array of systems, from
bare-bones virtual machines that only offer a couple of vulnerable systems to ornately
constructed fake networks spanning multiple servers. and therefore the goals of these who
build honeypots can vary widely also , starting from defense thorough to academic
research. additionally , there’s now an entire marketing category of deception technology
that, while not meeting the strict definition of a honeypot, is certainly within the same family.
But we’ll get thereto during a moment.honeypots aim to permit close analysis of how
hackers do their dirty work. The team controlling the honeypot can watch the techniques
hackers use to infiltrate systems, escalate privileges, and otherwise run amok through
target networks. These sorts of honeypots are found out by security companies,
academics, and government agencies looking to look at the threat landscape. Their
creators could also be curious about learning what kind of attacks are out there, getting
details on how specific sorts of attacks work, or maybe trying to lure a specific hackers
within the hopes of tracing the attack back to its source. These systems are often inbuilt
fully isolated lab environments, which ensures that any breaches don’t end in non-honeypot
machines falling prey to attacks.Production honeypots, on the opposite hand, are usually
deployed in proximity to some organization’s production infrastructure, though measures
are taken to isolate it the maximum amount as possible. These honeypots often serve both
as bait to distract hackers who could also be trying to interrupt into that organization’s
network, keeping them faraway from valuable data or services; they will also function a
canary within the coalpit , indicating that attacks are underway and are a minimum of
partially succeeding.
Which of the following tools performs comprehensive tests against web servers, including
dangerous files and CGIs?
A.
Nikto
B.
John the Ripper
C.
Dsniff
D.
Snort
Nikto
The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) contains six different
categories of control objectives. Each objective contains one or more requirements, which
must be followed in order to achieve compliance. Which of the following requirements
would best fit under the objective, "Implement strong access control measures"?
A.
Regularly test security systems and processes.
B.
Encrypt transmission of cardholder data across open, public networks.
C.
Assign a unique ID to each person with computer access.
D.
Use and regularly update anti-virus software on all systems commonly affected by malware.
Assign a unique ID to each person with computer access.
Page 17 out of 104 Pages |
Previous |